2NL BUvsBB somewhat loose passive
Posted by lagousar
Posted by
lagousar
posted in
Low Stakes
2NL BUvsBB somewhat loose passive
Blinds: $0.01/$0.02 (6 Players)
SB: $2.74
BB: $0.89
UTG: $0.97
MP: $2.01
CO: $2.72
BN: $2.98 (Hero)
BB: $0.89
UTG: $0.97
MP: $2.01
CO: $2.72
BN: $2.98 (Hero)
Preflop
($0.03)
Hero is BN with
8
8
, , ,
Flop
($0.09)
6
9
5
, ,
Turn
($0.21)
6
9
5
T
, ,
River
($0.41)
6
9
5
T
8
, ,
Final Pot
BN wins $0.40
Rake is $0.01
Rake is $0.01
Worths 3streets of value or what?
Loading 4 Comments...
Yes of course. As played we want to bet large OTR your sizing is too small I would bet at least pot or even shove. Your range is polarized and villain's range is full of bluff catchers. The fish's bluff-catching range should be fairly inelastic since you tagged him a fish therefore your value-bets should be larger.
What yoy mean by that? I know what is polarised i don't get how applys to my range.OTR you don't think the straight possibility should slow us down?
Well, OTR there are two missed flushdraws, and any 7 makes a straight QJ makes a straight, When you're betting the river here you're probably not value-betting JT or even 98. So when you bet the river here you either have it or you don't. Villain probably knows that, and when he has any of the above hands himself his calling-range will be pretty inelastic towards your different sizing (meaning it won't matter how much you bet because he will call or fold with the same range no matter how much it costs) So therefore you should bet as large as possible. This also gives your bluffs the highest amount of fold equity.
The turn bet seems a little wide for value and make sure that when using that turn sizing that you're not telegraphing the strength of your hand. Are you betting that small with an overpair. two pair, or a straight?
Be the first to add a comment