Save up to 50% during The A-Game Plan Week
×

25NLz - Too passive with top set?

Posted by

Posted by posted in Low Stakes

25NLz - Too passive with top set?

Blinds: $0.10/$0.25 (6 Players) BN: $15.99
SB: $102.41
BB: $25.00 (Hero)
UTG: $19.83
MP: $23.93
CO: $27.45
Preflop ($0.35) Hero is BB with A A
4 folds, SB raises to $0.70, Hero raises to $2.25, SB calls $1.55
Flop ($4.50) A 5 4
SB checks, Hero checks
Turn ($4.50) A 5 4 8
SB bets $2.37, Hero calls $2.37
River ($9.24) A 5 4 8 3
SB bets $2.91, Hero raises to $7.00, SB folds

Unknown villain.

I tend to CB 0.33psb my entire range at this flop.
But, villain is oop, we block lots of top pair and the NFD.
That's why I checked it back.

Turn I don't know if I'm raising or just calling. Of course we may find lots of value but I prefered to keep his bluffing range.
Maybe we should raise here and get value from two pairs, sets.

River he makes a small bet and I decided to raise small, maybe it's a mistake.
Should've we raise it bigger? I think he calls two pairs and sets when we do make a bigger size and we might find a fold when he clicks it back (possible 76s, A2s, 22?).

From the theorically view, solvers might go for 3barrell shoving the river, but in a real microstake scenario I don't think we'll get more value doing so.

Loading 3 Comments...

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy