Yeah, its a weird spot with the sizing/stack depth. @70bb behind in 61bb pot. I think I prefer flatting it sometimes pre or choosing a size giving us a little more playability. Like 22bb or 23bb maybe. This hand plays quite well IP as a call vs 3b.

So, as played, look at your equity vs JJ-AA assuming he traps. You are about 47% vs that range. Add in TT and you are 45% or so. Adding in all sets (doubt it based on preflop size) you are about 42%. I think we can certainly get better hands to fold Axss (besides the spade combos, which you heavily block). I probably just rip it in with this exact combo as played and not worry about it too much.

Wow, you're playing on Ignition? That's gutsy. They don't even have a gaming license.

4bet sizing seems bigger than it needs to be. I'm betting flop for like 25% pot (with almost my range) and giving up post that.

Any stats would be really helpful here, what does his 4bet calling range look like? If it's all like 88+, cbet may not be worth it. If he can show up with AT/A9 AND can fold them you have other options.

Yes, God Bless The USA but you do have better options for these stakes. I'm not saying to eliminate playing on Ignition...I'm just saying that you should look into what WPN and Chico (BetOnline) have to offer. For 25nlz? You should be playing on Betonline or BlackChip/America's Cardroom.

Definitely not worse so than Ignition...and at least Chico and WPN have gaming licenses. Ignition literally tells customers "just trust us as we have a good reputation and wouldn't do anything to harm that". It's incredible. Not to even mention that anonymous poker is a joke and a huge draw for botters.