#17 Why did I only have 40% Equity?
Posted by Pokerlogical
Posted by
Pokerlogical
posted in
Low Stakes
#17 Why did I only have 40% Equity?
Blinds: $0.01/$0.02 (6 Players)
BN: $2.00 (Hero)
SB: $2.02
BB: $8.61
UTG: $2.66
MP: $5.61
CO: $6.24
SB: $2.02
BB: $8.61
UTG: $2.66
MP: $5.61
CO: $6.24
Preflop
($0.03)
Hero is BN with
K
7
, , ,
Flop
($0.11)
T
9
J
, , , , ,
Turn
($4.03)
T
9
J
6
River
($4.03)
T
9
J
6
T
Final Pot
BB wins $3.87
Rake is $0.14
Rake is $0.14
wtf I knew he had a set but I thought I have 50% vs that with Monsterdraw but APPARANTLY I only have 40% wtf??????
why?
Loading 6 Comments...
You are still justified to stack off.
ya I guess I need to call after he jams it in... but I could have just called his check/raise too no?
Ofc. When he never folds value hands to a reraise or folds weaker drwas, calling might be better.
Because the board will sometimes pair, giving villain a full house.
easy math。
9c didn‘t work。
8 clubs and 2 Q.
10*4 = 40%
Your always 40% against a set with big combo draw even if your example 7s8s
VS AsAh on Ac5s6s
I never hate getting it in with hands like them because even if your up against the set you still have 40% equity at low stakes like these I don't mind getting it in because player can get it in extremely bad with 1 pair Etc
Be the first to add a comment