16NLz - Facing XR otr after X back ott - 3bpot
Posted by Mancuso
Posted by
Mancuso
posted in
Low Stakes
16NLz - Facing XR otr after X back ott - 3bpot
Blinds: $0.08/$0.16 (6 Players)
BN: $45.53 (Hero)
SB: $19.41
BB: $24.39
UTG: $70.28
MP: $9.37
CO: $15.76
SB: $19.41
BB: $24.39
UTG: $70.28
MP: $9.37
CO: $15.76
Preflop
($0.24)
Hero is BN with
K
K
, , , ,
Flop
($4.08)
5
T
T
, ,
Turn
($6.74)
5
T
T
Q
,
River
($6.74)
5
T
T
Q
9
, , ,
25/17 reg with 25% fold to 3b (only 362 hands on him)
I called otr 'cos I can't see he checking some value on the river after hero bets 1/3 otf and X back ott.
Loading 7 Comments...
He always has you beat otr if he raises you. Can be QQ TT 55 or 99. It's a real possibility that he's trapping OTR.
This line is seriously underbluffed, you can easily play Qx like this (so its not like your line is weak) and if someone is planning to bluff you, its usually by stabbing river, not x/r.
Villain was bluffing with Jx blocker.
He did a great bluff imo, but I also think that our call will be minus EV at these stakes.
he probably just calls with KJ tough so I'm still folding in this hand as his bluffs would make no sense and we have no blockers to his valuerange. I also agree he shouldn't check his valuehands again OTR to x/r but this usually leads to outleveling yourself and giving your opponent too much credit.
I prefeer check behind flop, call or bet turn and river, at this way I fold river most of time, very nice call on river, but I agree with you "He did a great bluff imo, but I also think that our call will be minus EV at these stakes"
Why a J is a good blocker in that scenario? Don't really get it, thanks !
Kinda look fishy. I would fold without info. Altough I expect most players to lead Tx or better rather than hoping to induce. I also prefer x/back flop and then start v-betting. Villain can put you in tough spots OTF, not to mention he can rep a ton more Tx than you can.
Be the first to add a comment