Out Now
×

[10NLZ] Facing a donk bet shove 3x pot OTR

Posted by

Posted by posted in Low Stakes

[10NLZ] Facing a donk bet shove 3x pot OTR

Hey, villain is unknown.
OTR I don't think my hand is a pure bluffcatcher because villain could potentially do this sometimes with a Jx or a nutflush, but maybe I am wrong... The most probable holding is still KK imo, I think he raises KJ often OTT, but again I am not sure at all....

8 Comments

Loading 8 Comments...

korn1337 6 years, 3 months ago

It's a big explo move, but folding this hand would be correct. People don't bluff such Rivers at micro/lowstakes enough. People at these stakes don't even turn a hand like Tx9h into a bluff on the river.

21 combos have you beat
villain used a very big river sizing, he needs to bluff 16.6 combos in order to hit GTO frequency. He needs to bluff more than 16.6 combos for you to make a +EV call, which will on average not happen in such a spot.

ChaoRen123 6 years, 3 months ago

Hey, thanks for your reply!
I definitely have a leak here as I thought given his line, he could have some lower value hands such as flushes at a non-zero frequency (which we can count as bluffs in this scenario), would you definitely exclude that from your thinking process?

korn1337 6 years, 3 months ago

Even if some opponents are very bad and let's say we give them on average a bad valueshove with weaker hands than FH, let's say 33% nutflushes and 33% of times a hand like AQo, it would still not be enough bluffs. (less than 10 bluffcombos)

HawksWin 6 years, 3 months ago

That Jh is like the nut worst card ever. Fills 2 straight flushes. The price isn't great and 88 really becomes a bluff catcher on a board where bluffs are going to be hard to come by. In game this is a tough one to find a fold but I think it is correct.

ChaoRen123 6 years, 3 months ago

hey, agreed that this is kind of a bad card. But villain in game I thought villain won't have Q9hh here, and not often AQhh... Even though I definitely think you are right on the hero fold :/

HawksWin 6 years, 3 months ago

ChaoRen123 I am curious to hear your thoughts on why SB wont have Q9hh and AQhh in a single raised pot as SB. I just completed a long drive home and was thinking about this hand trying to figure out what your point of view was. Just trying to figure out if I am missing something here. Thanks man.

ChaoRen123 6 years, 3 months ago

Hey, AQhh not really sure because it has sdvalue but I thought Q9hh and combo draw type hands without showdown value are way more often bet otf or check/raised. I could be wrong about the way the field plays, but I would also think that on the turn out of position especially with this SPR, straights would be raised a good chunk of the time. Not sure about anything I just said, those are just assumptions though :/

HawksWin 6 years, 3 months ago

I feel you.

In his shoes, I would c/c both AQhh and Q9hh on this flop. On turn, I start check/raising Q9 no heart and AQ no heart but me holding AQhh or Q9hh blocks so much of your semi bluffing range that I think I am inclined to just check/call. Your turn bet is quite polarized and the best set I can really put you on is 88 here and you are drawing to 9 outs (3 K's, 3 Q's, one 8 and 2 J's, since the Jh nuts you up with either holding). Aside from that, the best you are likely to have is 2pr which is drawing very thin and I would be afraid of losing you vs. a CR on the turn with these two nutted holdings.

Be the first to add a comment

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy