blocker could be relevant maybe...

But in general i think nearly everything got there and we can usually XF here...

Yeah I really couldn't see what he would be bluffing with and didn't think he would bet AA, AK on river like that so I ended up folding. Didn't feel good folding to such a small bet though.

I dont like raising flop since we're kinda capped. It's kinda important imo to protect our weaker range as well. As played it pretty much comes up to which hands we raise otf. Without reads I would check/fold, I've hard time believing fi will bluff vs unknown in this spot very often. Or that he's going to call down with worse. Feels like a "non-bluff" size as well but i dunno.

i would like a river fold dont see a single hand that comes 2 river which need 2 bluff and when he need 2 bluff he should try 2 rep a flush and normally ppl jam if they rep a flush so i think u can easyly fold ur hand.

Sick fold but seems to be correct sadly.  I also agree maybe calling flop and raising turn is better but there are some draws on flop someone could put you on here and stack off light to you since you didn't 3b preflop.  They can't see you having JJ and your most likely value hands here are 2 pair and draws.  I think GTO would say call but I'm no GTO whiz at all.  Just seems were running into flushes and KQs here to much.

Good spot to review though in CREV just because of the bet sizing.  Hope this helps.

Interesting considering flop call. Yeah we can't have KK or JJ so we are capped in that sense but top two will be so far ahead of his range that I think raising is good. There will be a lot of ugly turns and rivers so calling and raising flop seem kinda close. Not sure which is better. I would do a CRev simulation but I don't have the program.