[100nl] Qhi flush vs nit, Deep, Line check
Posted by antar
Posted by
antar
posted in
Low Stakes
[100nl] Qhi flush vs nit, Deep, Line check
HJ: $26
CO: $94.25
BN: $222.99
SB: $100
BB: $108.60
UTG: $180.35 (Hero)
CO: $94.25
BN: $222.99
SB: $100
BB: $108.60
UTG: $180.35 (Hero)
Preflop
($1.50)
(6 Players)
Hero was dealt
Q
T
Hero raises to $3, HJ calls $3, CO folds, BN calls $3, SB folds, BB folds
Hero raises to $3, HJ calls $3, CO folds, BN calls $3, SB folds, BB folds
Flop
($10.50)
A
3
J
(3 Players)
Hero bets $7,
HJ folds,
BN calls $7
Turn
($24.50)
4
(2 Players)
Hero bets $17,
BN calls $17
River
($58.50)
7
(2 Players)
Hero bets $40.95,
BN raises to $126.94,
Hero folds
Vilain 19/17 af 2.7
Never seen anything too fancy from him, never seen him raise a turn or a river on a 1700 hands sample.
I strongly doubt he would raise the river with a low flush and would have to turn something into a bluff, which i have never seen him do before. My range is obviously uncapped and i guess i would call with the King high flush.
Thoughts?
Loading 6 Comments...
This is really weird spot since it is multiway. I assume he would mostly squeeze AKs preflop, I dont see him having K9s-K2s, and depends how wide he would call with Axs. With him not putting you all in on river, but making it 120$ looks like its for value... Until i find out that he is capable of turning hands into bluff here(nut spade blocker, random floats), i am folding. Well played.
i would probably be betting a few extra dollars just to 'scare' him so that he fully does his nit thing and just call with lower flushes. you showed great discipline here well done, its tough sometimes to find folds over and over again during longer sessions: keep it up!
Thanks for the insights.
Just to make it clear, i believe flatting the river this deep with low flushes to be very standard and not particularly nitty. Obviously there is always a possibility of an opponent overplaying his hand into bluffing us...
I think in this spot I'm more worried about a hand like AsQx than 5s6s.
You are both about 200 bb's deep and he has to be aware that you are aware that he plays abc and tight if he really makes a bluff there its a well played by him. But overall that fold seems legit. One thing I try to notice against people I play longer against is if I can get timing-tells/bet amount tells. Lets say u played long time against him and when he betted more quickly he usually bluffed or had a good hand thats the only way you can make a calldown there if u remember that kind of information.
But of the sake off discussion lets say has he seen you valuebet your AK-AQ there because your line looks like one off those hands. In that situation lets say he has set or Ax(x means 2pair on that board) and goes for thin value? I personally would not mind doing that with a set in his position unless you check your AK-AQ when the 3rd speade hits with a REGULAR tendency lets say 80-90%?
You say he does not turn his hand into a bluff so you say he raises all flops with sets and 2pairs? In that case your fould is really good like the other guys said. I just want to up bring what villian seens in your range since he has played against you aswell? Overall how do you feel raising UTG and get 3-bet or playing out of position for me your Raise with QT feels a bit loose but I guess you knew how the whole table are playing?
QTs is in my default opening range from any position. On that particular table i felt i had no reason to tighten up.
I strongly believe he would raise OTF with set and probably AJ. I believe he calls two streets with A3 A4, though i don't rule out the possibility of him raising OTF w/ A3. But if for some reason he happens to have two pair by the river, raising for value seems really bad.
I am confident that my line represents better than just AK or AQ, and if I ever happen to sometimes do this with AK, that would be the absolute bottom of my value range (ie. that would not call a raise). I would say my line represents good two pair, sets and flushes.
Good fold
Be the first to add a comment