Thoughts on this hand $5.50 MTT
Posted by PhilG86
Posted by
PhilG86
posted in
Low Stakes
Thoughts on this hand $5.50 MTT
UTG: 0
UTG1: 20034
UTG2: 36275
UTG3: 89593
LJ: 57649 (Hero)
HJ: 22564
CO: 50254
BN: 23418
SB: 8900
BB: 73979
UTG1: 20034
UTG2: 36275
UTG3: 89593
LJ: 57649 (Hero)
HJ: 22564
CO: 50254
BN: 23418
SB: 8900
BB: 73979
Preflop
(1800)
(9 Players)
Hero was dealt
K
A
UTG1 folds, UTG2 folds, UTG3 raises to 3600, Hero raises to 7500, HJ folds, UTG folds, BN folds, SB folds, BB calls 6300, UTG3 calls 3900
UTG1 folds, UTG2 folds, UTG3 raises to 3600, Hero raises to 7500, HJ folds, UTG folds, BN folds, SB folds, BB calls 6300, UTG3 calls 3900
Flop
(23100)
J
4
5
(3 Players)
BB checks,
UTG3 bets 9600,
Hero raises to 49999, and is all in,
BB folds
Hi all, I've been trying to up my aggression in games recently and would like your thoughts on whether this play is OK or too spewy. Pot sizes above appear to be wrong for some reason, it's 3150 on flop and 25650 on turn. Blinds are 600/1200/150 with effective stack of 48bb (me). I have little history with utg3 who has not been at the table long but have been battling with BB who appears to be aggressive and better than the average Big $5.50 player. I think we are in the money at this stage but far from any significant pay jumps.
I think JJ,TT,AQ could easily make up a large part of either players range. I didn't want to call and face a shove from BB and I felt any raise would commit me so I elected to shove.
Loading 5 Comments...
I would have raised to 9600 pre. Other than that I would have done the same on the flop. I feel villian would do this with any pair since his stack is so large. We might as well put maximum pressure, but I'm a noob so pay no mind to me.
Can you please repost the hand, or just the handhistory with the accurate numbers. It's really confusing now. ty in advance.
Sorry, I've had similar problems with previous HHs uploaded via a different method and I've seen other people have a similar problem. I'm not sure what's going wrong. All the figures except pot sizes are correct, it seems not to take antes into consideration. If you have any idea why this might be so please let me know. It's taken from PT4 software.
I have no idea, never posted a hand on here. Maybe you can post the hand in plain text as a reply to my post, will probably make a lot more sense then, because turnplay is now missing etc.
Oh yeah, turnplay is supposed to be missing as I didn't want results to impact anyone's opinion. BB folded and utg3 called fwiw.
Be the first to add a comment