Sunday 6Max $162 FT, 30BB AQo has been 3bet by CL 18/12/2.3 (400 hands)
Posted by gradx
Posted by
gradx
posted in
High Stakes
Sunday 6Max $162 FT, 30BB AQo has been 3bet by CL 18/12/2.3 (400 hands)
BN: 684689
SB: 1064204
BB: 1044606
UTG: 912504
HJ: 632616 (Hero)
CO: 811381
SB: 1064204
BB: 1044606
UTG: 912504
HJ: 632616 (Hero)
CO: 811381
Preflop
(30000)
(6 Players)
Hero was dealt
A
Q
UTG folds, Hero raises to 40000, CO folds, BN folds, SB raises to 101111, BB folds
UTG folds, Hero raises to 40000, CO folds, BN folds, SB raises to 101111, BB folds
Villain is a standard tight reg.
I prefer to flat with 3:1 odds and 2:1 SPR while others prefer folding or 4b/c?
Doesn't really play much differently for me OOP and with AQs I'm always seeing a flop.
Loading 14 Comments...
I think this is a pretty easy shove vs. all but the tighest of SBs.
2.3% 3bet over 400 hands is well within "the tightest of SB"
Villain is a standard tight reg. That doesn't imply villian has a 2.3 3b over 300 hands. I guess vs. this guy i'd just call.
But this is where HUD can be deceiving because if the majority of those hands are collected over the early stages of an MTT you can expect an all but none existant SB 3bet%.
I think shoving is a pretty huge punt here, very easy call, don't commit ICM suicide, + vs described villain it seems like shoving is probably -cev.
I'd also add that "The majority of those hands are collected over the early stages of an MTT you can expect an all but none existant SB 3bet%" This makes no sense, plenty of reasons to 3bet from SB (or any position expect maybe UTG+1) at early and late stages of tournaments.
Plenty of reasons for doing it, and actually doing it are very different though. If villain is a standard tight reg as OP said, we can likely infer he has an autopilot game for early stages that doesn't include SB LAG play.
3betting isn't LAG, if the btn opens or co opens and we have AJo or Kqo its a standard 3bet for most good players. If someone has a tight 3bet % over 400 hands, I see no reason why they would start lagging it up at a FT.
Anyone else likes 4 betting to 220000 and folding to a shove here?
I think it's the worst of all, hand as strong as AQ to 4b/fold, do it with A2o or whatever shitty hand with a blocker. Flat should be the finest vs such tight guy i guess.
Anybody just folding here? Against those stats (validity aside), we can perhaps assume we are facing only QQ+ & AK? If we call, other than AQx or QQx I'm not sure what flop we like enough to convince us otherwise.....
pretty sure 4b/c is AIDS
Shoving 590k to win 170k with 30% or less equity at best versus villain's calling range. This doesn't look attractive given SB has to have a such a high 3-bet bluffing range to make this +EV - from your read/stats its suggested that his 3-bet is very narrow. However, i'm usually inclined to get it in as a shorter stack and as i'm expecting bigger stacks to try put pressure on me
I'm hoping that you can find a CALL > outright FOLDING pre given pot odds and position.
What was the result of this dude? I'm guessing you jammed and he had AK?
Be the first to add a comment