Regarding ICMizer ranges
Posted by wilsonyeung813
Posted by wilsonyeung813 posted in High Stakes
Regarding ICMizer ranges
hey man do u think its better to shove WIDER than ICmizer ranges (NOT icmizer nash ranges, but ranges against certain opening ranges/calling ranges) in FTs? coz i don wanna fold 77 12.5bbs UTG 6 handed, or even 22 on the btn 12bbs.. or not jam KQo from SB w 19bbs vs CO 45% raise first in.. just a few examples haha
This is a HH from today party 109:
Hand History for Game 15555790983
NL Texas Hold'em $109 USD Buy-in Trny:129158855 Level:17 Blinds-Antes(4,000/8,000 -1,000) - Thursday,September 29, 20:34:40 CT 2016
Table Heavyweight: Kangaroo - $5,000 Gtd (129158855) Table #8 (Real Money)
Seat 4 is the button
Total number of players : 5/9
Seat 4: mateee ( 89,725 )
Seat 6: nanlangstyle99 ( 158,916 )
Seat 7: hamdervinder ( 714,662 )
Seat 8: s0mnAmnA ( 156,688 )
Seat 9: MaxBCG ( 412,809 )
Trny:129158855 Level:17
Blinds-Antes(4,000/8,000 -1,000)
mateee posts ante [1,000 ]
nanlangstyle99 posts ante [1,000 ]
hamdervinder posts ante [1,000 ]
s0mnAmnA posts ante [1,000 ]
MaxBCG posts ante [1,000 ]
nanlangstyle99 posts small blind [4,000 ].
hamdervinder posts big blind [8,000 ].
* Dealing down cards *
Dealt to nanlangstyle99 [ Qs, Kh ]
s0mnAmnA folds
MaxBCG raises [ 16,000 ]
mateee folds
nanlangstyle99 is all-In [ 153,916 ]
So the CO has a raise first in from CO of roughly 45%.. ok. so shoving is print roughly 15k chips on avg (which represents close to 10% of our stack). but then ICmizer says this is -$8....
i feel like in reality to maximise $EV its better to push wider than ICMizer ranges, anyone agree?
Loading 0 Comments...
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.
This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.