NLHE $1.35 Knockout Turbo - Questionable PF action and tough flop
Posted by JGustavo
Posted by JGustavo posted in Low Stakes
NLHE $1.35 Knockout Turbo - Questionable PF action and tough flop
Blinds: t250/t500 (8 Players)
MP: 9,375
UTG+1: 19,852
MP+1: 1,049
CO: 10,010 (Hero)
BN: 5,376
SB: 9,970
BB: 10,290
UTG: 3,530
UTG+1: 19,852
MP+1: 1,049
CO: 10,010 (Hero)
BN: 5,376
SB: 9,970
BB: 10,290
UTG: 3,530
The real villain is the MP(19,852 chips) not UTG+1(9,375).
My reads are:
UTG+1 is a weak loose passive player, loves to limp. VPIP 35/PR 5
MP is a loose passive too, slightly agro than UTG+1. VPIP 35/PR 15 (Played previous hands strangely)
My reads are:
UTG+1 is a weak loose passive player, loves to limp. VPIP 35/PR 5
MP is a loose passive too, slightly agro than UTG+1. VPIP 35/PR 15 (Played previous hands strangely)
Preflop
(750)
Hero is CO with
8
A
, , , , , , ,
After 2 limps, I decided to take the pot PF or if MP calls, at the flop. So i raise big knowing that they limp a lot.
Flop
(5,730)
Q
K
T
,
Here I don't know if I should cbet. To me, the villain's range is QJo,JT, J9, T9, T8, suited or not. I really don't want to be pot committed since the pot is 5,730 and my stack is 7,950 and the villain had 17,792. And one of the reasons I didn't cbet was that he might check/raise me.
Turn
(5,730)
Q
K
T
6
,
After his check, I put him on medium/low connectors, T sometimes but rarely. I didn't thought about a late cbet, only after reviewing the hand. So I decided that maybe Ace high could be the winning hand and just check.
River
(5,730)
Q
K
T
6
T
,
After his check I have no idea why I checked back. Only connectors would play like that, so probably here I was afraid of villain do something crazy.
Final Pot
UTG+1
wins and shows two pair, Tens and Sixes.
UTG+1 wins 5,730
UTG+1 wins 5,730
Aftermath, he had 76o.
Loading 3 Comments...
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.
This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.