Nice to have the Ah on board because it eliminates so many flush draws from his hand that would dominate you. It also seems unlikely for him to have a 4 or 2 in his hand more likely an overpair. I think your sizing was good - don't think you can go too much larger on such a scary board. Did he have an A?

That was my other thought but it seemed unlikely......sry

I like the sizing on all streets really especially on the river......good job. Hard to imagine he would have called anything much larger with 2 pairs on the board and the 3 flush

Exploitative good sizing on turn but I don't think you have to bet flop that big. 180 seems sufficient to me because we are still with 9high vs a passive opponent who won't really float us here and his continuing range is inelastic to our bet size. 

Turn, I like the big bet.

River is probably the most interesting. I would want to nationality check the player along with his stats and decide. For example, if he is Greek (sorry Greek people) or Australian (I'm an Aussie too) I would go bigger because hey they have top pair...CALL. So something like 1400 seems good. If no really country read, I would still maybe go closer to half pot. I doubt the extra few chips will sway them if they are a passive opponent with a good top pair hand. Vs this villain as a whole population pool of passive players, I think your sizing is good because it gets paid a vast majority of the time but could maybe get a bit more. 

Yes his flop calling range is inelastic, which is why you should be betting a bit smaller here. His calling range is inelastic - not his whole range. He folds flop a ton and we don't have to bluff so big.  Having no showdown being a reason for betting bigger with an inelastic calling range makes no sense when you consider what i just stated. 

I think it's an exploitably well played hand but i would just go a bit bigger on river if we're exploiting here. I did say just a bit bigger, not much but you could probably squeeze out another 100 chips from him. 

I didn't say his whole range is elastic. I said the hands he calls with on the flop, he calls with regardless of sizing (within reason) and his folding range just folds regardless of sizing. Capping our flop sizing to 180 (40%) on his flop seems reasonable i would argue, on this particular occasion. 

Do you think he flats QJo here? If you think he does then he's pretty loose pre-flop. And if he is loose pre flop i maintain you could probably bet a little bigger here on river. 

For a non-native English speaker you seem to be able to put sophisticated sentences together! :D

Why can't you bet 40% with range? Having two bet sizes on this flop is way too transparent.

I'm curious, do you have any stats on the villian?  This would change my bet sizing drastically.  If no stats, I'll try and make reads if they are a "calling station".  Against calling stations" I'll usually bet 70-80% of pot to get value.  Against others usually 60%ish.

So what exactly are we meant to be saying here, if your asking for opinions on bet sizing but debating against other suggestions? 

If he shoves would you fold here? You played the hole hand considering he has an Ax on his hand, right? So, i think your bet on river could be much much bigger. I think most players wouldn't fold Ax here to any bets. Also, with an A on his hand he might me thinking you're bluffing and this is one more reason for you to bet bigger. I would go for 1400 considering his stack

He repps a 2 or a 4, don't you think? Shoving after your bet.. I'd call anyway... I just think you could bet much more at the river as i said before

Maybe A2s, A4s, 32s? I think its not likely, but it is possible... So it just reinforce that he had an Ax and that's the reason why i think you should bet much bigger on river, don't you agree? A 1400 or even a bigger bet would look like a bluff here 

I agree with most of it. What i don't agree is with his AT-A5 need to fold to bigger bets. We agree that is very unlike him to have a flush an a 2/4. If he has it, its ok, its a risk worth to taken. So, we play the hole hand putting him on an A. For me the important thing here is: what is he thinking our range is? In my opinion, most of the time he thinks you're bluffing. Your bet on flop and turn reduces the flush range and 2/4 is not in your range as well. So, since he has an A, he problably thinks you are bluffing. And, if he thinks that, he would call your bet. And, with that in mind, i think that a bigger bet or even an over bet would looks like a bluff (more than a <1000 bet). If i were playing this hand i would think you have a pair and trying to bluff. But, with your bet on the river i wouldn't feel confortable, because it is a bet from someone that wants a call.. Maybe thats why he spend a good time thinking...

Raphael's range is pretty uncapped here given he can have all flushes, Ax, and both quads. So i disagree that most of the time someone would think he is bluffing. It's pretty tough to be calling down here wider than <flush because his bluffing range is hard to find other than 3 high card flush blockers being Jh+.

If you're calling down here with A5-AT (or even calling these hands pre flop) then you need to recheck your strategies and maybe find your showdown line in HEM/PT4. 

my sizing: 200-240-520-1120

dont like the turnsize, makes youre range look lot stronger imo.

So you are fine with having very little bluffs on this turn, and not making some valuehands to bluff instead?

Makes sense, and youre high pp, you wont turn them into bluffs? Or you have them in youre c/c c/c-c/f range? Cant that be exploitable? If you check call thoose one street, fi can just continue barrel you away.

But im curius on youre GTO size. How do you know that sizing is optimal in that spot?

Agree with John, on your flop bet (i think 180 is more than fine), for same reasons.
Turn i like it, now on the river i´ll bet something like 1.2K