Are Turbo's/hyper turbos inherently bad?

Posted by

Posted by posted in Low Stakes

Are Turbo's/hyper turbos inherently bad?

Are turbos/hyper turbos a waste of time? I assume they are a lower skill format and therefore a higher variance format, but still profitable. They seem to run alot more than regular SNG's

2 Comments

Loading 2 Comments...

escaper 5 years, 8 months ago

To me they are the best. It's been my core game when I learned poker. There is a good roadmap to start with 18-45 turbo sngs; start with 1,5 dollar and grow to 7 or 15. Then you can also play almost all the low stakes turbo sngs in between.

  • So many bad people like to play them. So you definately can have an edge
  • They are faster, so your hourly goes up put in good volume
  • They run way more often so you can
  • Variance is bigger yes
  • You get really good in end game. You deal with final table experience more often and you'll learn to be aware of stack positions and icm.
  • Your push/fold strategy will be great if u keep reviewing hands

GLHF at the tables.

Sextonhardcastle 5 years, 8 months ago

I'd say theyre a pretty good tool for learning icm, push/fold, etc. Edge is small cause of the structure. really just depends on what your goals are. I prefer the big field, high edge, high payout mtts

Be the first to add a comment

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy