Another limp spot with a big fold?
Posted by computerscreen
Posted by
computerscreen
posted in
Low Stakes
Another limp spot with a big fold?
UTG: 95744
UTG1: 322718
UTG2: 70903 (Hero)
LJ: 93640
HJ: 45192
CO: 40557
BN: 61812
SB: 101260
BB: 81174
UTG1: 322718
UTG2: 70903 (Hero)
LJ: 93640
HJ: 45192
CO: 40557
BN: 61812
SB: 101260
BB: 81174
I have the most advantage at the table, 1 very good player, a few meh regs. I limped the previous hand and folded to a 9bbs shove last hand. This is a final table.
Preflop
(10500)
(9 Players)
Hero was dealt
J
J
UTG folds, UTG1 folds, Hero calls 7000, LJ folds, HJ folds, CO raises to 39857, and is all in, BN raises to 61112, and is all in, SB folds, BB raises to 80474, and is all in, Hero folds
UTG folds, UTG1 folds, Hero calls 7000, LJ folds, HJ folds, CO raises to 39857, and is all in, BN raises to 61112, and is all in, SB folds, BB raises to 80474, and is all in, Hero folds
Flop
(198943)
J
7
A
(3 Players)
Turn
(198943)
J
7
A
3
(3 Players)
River
(198943)
J
7
A
3
3
(3 Players)
Final Pot
BB has
Q
Q
BN has
J
A
CO has
T
A
BN
wins 136371
,
BN
wins 42510
Loading 29 Comments...
I know everyone is pushing play to win first 1-3 places, but calling off this hand after 3 players in similar spots will just make you finish the game 9 out of ten and you wont get any shot to try to win so i think fold is good there ( not to get into why he limped JJ and that they should have been shoved first place )
I don't care if what I'm doing to fish is obvious to regs. I don't have to be balanced vs. fish, just optimal. When a reg starts calling me correctly, I then adjust again and start making more outside of the box plays. And I don't mind throwing in some odd plays like limps in these spots, etc. simply b/c it will look suspicious to regs and will sometimes work better than a normal min-steal the first time or so you try it.
Again, I still have a hard time believing that you're only limping trash 1.8% of the time...50/50 mix of JJ+ and trash. If this is the case then I'm obviously not jamming my 99/1010 etc. if I'm the bb. But, this isn't the case. Based on your posts it feels like your limping 50% of the time with only 2% or so being nutted. So, based on that alone, you can see why I'm so eager to pounce on the limps and iso the others widely. Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm only forming my opinion based on the the hands you've posted so far, since I don't know you and have probably never played with you.
im reminding you both because im sure you both are willing and with good hearts anticipate in discussion~
I'm only playing on Merge right now since I live in the US. But, something I've noticed in recent times is that a lot of the higher stakes top OPR players are making the same, at first strange, short stack EP limps....and in general they're folding to my aggression. When I started seeing this in the last couple months, my first reaction was WTF is this top player doing limping a 9bb stack utg and folding to a shove, etc or showing down J9o on the times it gets to showdown, etc. I'm starting to understand the reasoning behind it, although it's still up in the air whether it's sound or not. Most good regs would argue it isn't. This was my first reaction, too, but I realize a lot of what they're trying is player dependent and situational and in some cases may be better than a shove or fold, etc.
As far as metagame etc. the 180 man field is often complained about as being reg invested, but these regs are tag and abc robots, they take notes and adjust but thats it. They can't mix their ranges and therefore allow you to run over the game as long as they can 3bet shove 99 at you and smile if you fold. Do they know how wide they can be? Of course not or they too would be min raising q2s utg.
I play these regs everyday, very good regs are not able to adjust to this because in order to adjust they must first understand how to play 96o 12bbs in a min raised pot with 2 callers.
conflict to escalate since im enjoying both of your veiws and opinions :)
Be the first to add a comment