9 10 suited spot peel 3 bet or fold?
Posted by MARIUS bogdan
Posted by
MARIUS bogdan
posted in
Mid Stakes
9 10 suited spot peel 3 bet or fold?
Blinds: t1,600/t3,200 (9 Players)
MP: 12,868
UTG+1: 53,184
MP+1: 58,172
MP+2: 132,153
CO: 71,608 (Hero)
BN: 83,071
SB: 100,499
BB: 39,472
UTG: 75,172
UTG+1: 53,184
MP+1: 58,172
MP+2: 132,153
CO: 71,608 (Hero)
BN: 83,071
SB: 100,499
BB: 39,472
UTG: 75,172
Preflop
(4,800)
Hero is CO with
9
T
, , ,
Flop
(21,430)
3
2
7
, , ,
Turn
(210,801)
3
2
7
Q
River
(210,801)
3
2
7
Q
3
Final Pot
MP+2
wins and shows two pair, Sevens and Threes.
CO lost and shows a pair of Threes.
MP+2 wins 150,256
CO lost and shows a pair of Threes.
MP+2 wins 150,256
do you guys peel with this stacks ? initial raiser is a small stake reg or fish dont know only 18 hands on him so stats are irelevant the guys after me were prety tight dot know if this would have been a better 3 bet with the stacks behind or a call
Loading 4 Comments...
I would prefer 3 betting or folding pre, its a pretty hand but with only 22bb were too short to flat here. I think I would just fold this hand pre, it kind of sucks to 3 bet this short as stack to pot ratio is very small, and 3 bet folding off 22bb sucks as it dramatically reduces our playability if we fall to 16bbs or so.
I agree with riverbanged. I think we just need to fold here, and would 3b with more stats to support a loose opening villain. In this case I would 3bet all in, would not be 3b folding this spot.
Play well post flop. Why shove?
If you connect, I think raised all in is right.
I fold pre. We're a little too short to be flatting with the stacks sizes behind (even if they are on the tighter side). The BB is very short and probably jamming wider after seeing this pot build after we flat.
Agree with Douggy- if opener is getting out of line with his opens I wouldn't mind 3-bet jam. Never 3betting without jamming in this spot.
Be the first to add a comment