PokerStars - $154+$154+$12|3500/7000 Ante 700 NL - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4: http://www.pokertracker.com

BB: 79.14 BB (VPIP: 21.08, PFR: 16.67, 3Bet Preflop: 8.13, Hands: 353)
UTG: 7.49 BB (VPIP: 15.36, PFR: 10.08, 3Bet Preflop: 4.76, Hands: 386)
Hero (MP): 34.76 BB
CO: 16.09 BB (VPIP: 18.11, PFR: 15.00, 3Bet Preflop: 10.39, Hands: 543)
BTN: 16.04 BB (VPIP: 24.33, PFR: 17.71, 3Bet Preflop: 9.55, Hands: 376)
SB: 50.09 BB (VPIP: 16.83, PFR: 11.54, 3Bet Preflop: 5.66, Hands: 209)

6 players post ante of 0.1 BB, SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 2.1 BB) Hero has Qh Kh
fold, Hero raises to 2.25 BB, fold, fold, SB calls 1.75 BB, BB calls 1.25 BB

Flop : (7.35 BB, 3 players) Kd 8s 6d
SB checks, BB bets 1.89 BB, Hero raises to 5.52 BB, fold, BB calls 3.63 BB

Turn : (18.39 BB, 2 players) 4s
BB checks, Hero checks

River : (18.39 BB, 2 players) 6s
BB bets 15 BB, fold

Villain is a good reg.

He leads flop 3 way less than 1/3 pot. I am not sure what I was thinking during the hand, but I guess more or less it went like this:

If he is leading so small, he must be trying to take a stab with a bad draw. I raise, and if he continues, I reevaluate on further streets.

In retrospective, I think that such a small lead will be an induce more often than not. Giving such good odds to 2 players does not make any sense, unless he wants to realize some equity with a FD.

What do you guys think about this hand?