Im currently looking at a playlist for NLHE, both essential and elite.

9/10 of latest Mark Lammers videos are 500z session review/live session
9/10 for Teunuss session review/live session
9/10 for Progrezzive session review/live session
10/10 for Zeljko 500z session review/live session
10/10 for Javier Caballo 200z session review/live session
10/10 for Erazer 500z session review/live session
10/10 for Innerpsy 500z session review/live session

I really love that RIO is hiring one of the best NL players in the world and that we have constant acces for new videos.
The thing is, and i know that im not only one that thinks that way, we could really use some diversity in formats for most guys that are delivering videos.

Why dont we change something? Its proven that we're learning in more efficient way if conent is actually more entertaining/interesting/inquiring.
What about 2 coaches discussing session review in one video? What about some more coach-student interactions, where we get less monologs and more discussion about hands. Maybe even elite guys reviewing some essential coaches footage's at mid stakes.

I understand that its more difficult to create some diverse content than just to play and comment your 500z game. Also, yeah, it would sometimes cost more to get two guys to create one video instead of 1 for 1.

The thing is tho, we're currently getting like 30-40 NLH videos per month. Its fucktones of videos. The truth is that no one is able to watch it all. Its super tough to watch at least half of these, if we are talking about learning in efficient way. And to be honest, nowadays solid zoom grinders are playing in pretty similar way anyway, so i dont think that argument about diffrent guys playing diffrent styles over these videos is really valid.

I would be last to complain if RIO staff would decide to sacrifice some quantity for better quality.