Hey guys,

i am a fairly new PIO-user and i tried "recreating" some of the hands/analyses that i saw in some of the videos on RIO. Sometimes my "results" are quite close to what is shown in the videos, sometimes my results are a good bit different.

I have come up with sort of my "standard spot" settings for PIO, just from how i feel poker is played. so i gave IP 3 betsizes on flop (33%, 67%, 140%) , 3 on the turn (67% , 90%, 140%) and 3 on the turn (50%, 100%, Allin) also there is Flop- and turnraises of 60% and a riverraise is always to Allin.

For OOP i have donkbets only on riv for either 75% or Allin (no donks on flop or turn as they are so rare ingame), but raises on flop (60%) or turn (60% or Allin) aswell as riv (100% or allin)

This for me kinda seems reasonable to "real life" conversion on the tables, no super rare donks, no crazy big raises, no tiny turnbets, no 4xPot bets, etc... Now to my "problem":

For example in Mark Lammers' new video "Pio Quiz: turn plays" He analyzes a spot on a 9s 5s 2d spot with the following settings:

Now, i have used the exact same ranges (even with weights) and the same board and let PIO run the sim and here comes the fun part... His results differ A LOT from mine. In his sim PIO uses the 33% sizing for 53% of his range and checks 22%... in my sim Pio checks about the same 23%, but only uses the 33% for 10% of range, and bets 67% with 66% of the range.

(Notice that in my case the sim is thought out to be 1kNL, and in Marks its 500NL, but stacks etc are proportional.

What the f*ck can be the reason for that? its exact same ranges, i let PIO calc to 0.5% of pot, Mark to 0.3%... What am i missing? HEEEEEELP PLEASE :)

cheers