s1nooo

PokerStars - €10 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 4 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

Hero (BB): 113.91 BB
CO (CO): 50 BB (VPIP: 17.33, PFR: 13.33, 3Bet Preflop: 3.13, Hands: 78)
BTN (BTN): 132.23 BB (VPIP: 29.76, PFR: 21.95, 3Bet Preflop: 7.53, Hands: 207)
SB (SB): 56.8 BB (VPIP: 26.32, PFR: 19.30, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 58)

SB posts SB 0.5 BB, Hero posts BB 1 BB

Dealt to Hero:


fold, BTN raises to 2.14 BB, fold, Hero calls 1.14 BB

Flop (4.78 BB, 2 players):

Hero checks, BTN checks

Turn (4.78 BB, 2 players):

Hero checks, BTN bets 3.25 BB, Hero raises to 11 BB, BTN calls 7.75 BB

River (26.78 BB, 2 players):

Hero bets 19.96 BB, BTN calls 19.96 BB

Hero shows:

(Flush, Ace High)
(Pre 56%, Flop 64%, Turn 80%)

BTN mucks:

(Flush, Ace High)
(Pre 44%, Flop 36%, Turn 20%)

Hero wins 66.5 BB

Hand -> http://weaktight.com/6905206

Hi guys, I already played that hand and I want to listen your opinions about my  reasoning in order to have a balanced range, I check raised turn in order to keep bluffing so many rivers like 8, T, Q, and maybe 9, and betting for value flushes, trips, and two pair. I want to know if my line on the turn is better than CC turn. I think in turn I can play this way 99, 77, K9 and 22, and balance it with semibluffs like this one (around same combos bluffs-value). My questions are: 1- Is better to have a check-raising range here than a CC (100%)? 2.- Should this hand be one of the semibluffs hands? Ty guys and sorry bad english!