30:07
Would it be a thin to hold a Qh here and do a medium size value bet? anyway it's river, so we can use multiple sizings. SB would bet a lot of AhKx type FD on the turn w 1/4~1/3 (at least, if he is a reg.), and after moving on to river XX on TURN, I think Qh is worth it to bet on CO's side OTR. because SB would have a lot of Qh, Kh, Ah hand as b-x-b ., so what do you think?
In solver world , It's clear stab. but what I curious about is real world.
And what should I do to get this footage review? I'm really happy to get a footage review from you, and if it doesn't work, I asked because I wanted to get it from another pro
Yeh solver will definitely value bet a lot of heart combos here, and will develop various sizes based on that. I think we can have 2 sizes without messing it up and being too complex - perhaps 30% and 70% and split/balance our range accordingly.
Footage review - I think RIO runs these for members who are randomly selected, and coaches take it in turns to do the review. Don't quote me on that and perhaps members have to apply.
Hi Gary,
I really appreciate you taking the time to do this and offer this, it is nice to have another pair of eyes (especially someone much better than me) to look at my hands and give helpful advice. Especially when you explain how you are thinking through spots because I can contrast that with how my thought process currently works.
Thank you, Gary. My understanding of the reason to size up the 3 bet IP specifically otb is due to having a flatting range (which would make our 3 betting range more polarized). Happy to be wrong and will adjust appropriately if that’s the case.
Loading 7 Comments...
Wooo another new format from you! Getting some variations this year, love to see it!
:D
30:07
Would it be a thin to hold a Qh here and do a medium size value bet? anyway it's river, so we can use multiple sizings. SB would bet a lot of AhKx type FD on the turn w 1/4~1/3 (at least, if he is a reg.), and after moving on to river XX on TURN, I think Qh is worth it to bet on CO's side OTR. because SB would have a lot of Qh, Kh, Ah hand as b-x-b ., so what do you think?
In solver world , It's clear stab. but what I curious about is real world.
And what should I do to get this footage review? I'm really happy to get a footage review from you, and if it doesn't work, I asked because I wanted to get it from another pro
and thanks for comfortable and nice video!
Yeh solver will definitely value bet a lot of heart combos here, and will develop various sizes based on that. I think we can have 2 sizes without messing it up and being too complex - perhaps 30% and 70% and split/balance our range accordingly.
Footage review - I think RIO runs these for members who are randomly selected, and coaches take it in turns to do the review. Don't quote me on that and perhaps members have to apply.
Hi Gary,
I really appreciate you taking the time to do this and offer this, it is nice to have another pair of eyes (especially someone much better than me) to look at my hands and give helpful advice. Especially when you explain how you are thinking through spots because I can contrast that with how my thought process currently works.
I've already put some of your advice to good use.
Thanks so much.
No problem mate, I’m glad you found it useful. If you ever have any questions then don’t be shy to PM me
Thank you, Gary. My understanding of the reason to size up the 3 bet IP specifically otb is due to having a flatting range (which would make our 3 betting range more polarized). Happy to be wrong and will adjust appropriately if that’s the case.
perhaps use slightly bigger 3B sizes on BTN compared to CO/MP, but definitely not 4x. Using a 3-3.5x 3B size IP is fine, 4-5x oop.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.