Zoom vs. regular tables
Posted by whiteshark
Posted by whiteshark posted in Low Stakes
Zoom vs. regular tables
Hi everyone, I am currently wondering whether I should grind in the Zoom pool or rather play on regular tables.
I guess the decision between the two depends on several factors. Currently my main focus is really just to become better at the game and develop a theoretical understanding for as many spots as I can. I am not planning to build up a bankroll right now at NL2-NL10. Once I am beating a limit over a reasonable sample size, I just move up, potentially with an additional deposit.
My personal hunch is that for the learning process, Zoom tables should be preferable since I am playing way more hands and thus train myself in more diverse scenarios and spots as on regular tables. In terms of winrate (and building a bankroll), regular tables should be more profitable in order to target weaker players. I guess my preferred game type should be Zoom right now, but I'm eager to hear your opinion.
Are there any other notable differences between the two?
Loading 6 Comments...
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.
This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.