27/13 (611)
F3b 32
AF 21/33/41
He is a recreational player, but his ranges might not be that far from some reggish ones

this guy had so far pretty low fold to cbet, so I decided to deviate from my standard 3x 3bet size.

Since his fold to cbet is on a lower side so far, I dont want to be using a range bet strategy. Thats the reason why I sized it up (solver also likes 1/2, esp. with this combo).
Folding is probably out of the question, since he might be merge raising the same hand as mine and there are many possible draws.

Wasnt really sure, I was literally considering all 3 options. Shoving to charge his bluffs, but since we are IP, I talked to myself that, I can easily fold on diamond rivers. I decided to call mainly, because his bluffs from the flop (draws and backdoors) didnt really improve, so my assumption was that he has enough bluffs in his range to justify calling compared to his value - 66,44,64s, maybe 75s.

On this river, even in theory its supposed to be a fold. However, solver would call on any non-diamond river (only 5 is mixing between calling and folding). Do you agree? I am not so sure that in practice its gonna be super +ev..