Theory doubt

Posted by

Posted by posted in Mid Stakes

Theory doubt

I have a doubt people i hope you can explain to me, here we go:
For example, our opponent bets 1P on the flop so we have to defend more or less 50% of our range, when an opponent bets 1P we have to put 1P to win 3P so we need at least 33% equity against his betting range, but if we have to defend at least 50% of our range to not being exploitable folding to much perhaps we need hands with less than 33% equity, do you understand what i mean?
Sorry if my english is not very good, thank you.

Loading 52 Comments...

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy