Good morning. This is a general question about strat vs. a specific hand. Perhaps someone here who has done the maths to solve for their own game would be kind enough to enlighten me.

I find I have a difficult time with players who sit directly to my left or 1 space over and call their entire range which is incredibly wide. They play for luck and not for skill, calling 3bets with Q5s and rivering with a flush when what a decent players 3bet calling range “should” be is impossible to have. Here I’m quoting a direct example.

I’m trying to devolop a strat against these guys and not just leave the table, since I’d rather learn a valuable skill than run away.

I’ve thought about increasing my opening size in these specific situations and increase my opening range as well, playing more of a HU hand range however with removal I’m not sure if this would be correct. And then what to do about 3betting ranges? Do we have more incentive to raise wider when villain is calling everything anyway or should we instead call with our premium hands and have no 3betting range at all?

If anyone has some insight or may have done the maths and is willing to share I’d be very appreciative.

Thanks in advance.