I have both Snowie and pio and generally use pio for bvb, bb vs open etc spots and in general any spot where ranges are not affected by having to take other players into consideration. For those spots I use snowie, for example mp vs utg 2.5x calling and 3b ranges. I wanted to see if they come up with similar ranges when given the exact same situation and the results were very far from each other.

I took an utg 2.25x open and mp potsized 3b range and input those into pio. I gave pio options to pot4bet, call or fold with 100nl rake. I took potsized 4b because snowie already had it's range for that.

Here are results

https://i.gyazo.com/f082bcc31d80063ed84db8c8a1c39b9c.png

https://i.gyazo.com/93d6a0f457983f1c3d0c9dddb0774e08.png

Why the hell are the results so different? 1.5bb explo and 50subet in pio. From what I know about both softwares I trust pio's ranges to be better but I've also understood snowie to be pretty solid and have had a very good hsnl player tell me it's really good for 6m. What's the reason for the different ranges then?