MP+2 is really weak, BB isnt agg squeezor, so I decided to call. In addition MP+1 is a tight reg with lower cbet, so we will get to showdown more often..

Was sort of thinking about the line I wanna take.. I think most of MP+1 FDs are either cbetting the flop or would bet now. Similar apply to his gutters JTs,KJs,KTs which I think might be tempted to bet, but would prob fold to a bet given the player behind still left to act.. I also dont need much of a protection from AK,AJ,AT type of hands.. and possibly might get much value from Qx by x/raising. since KQ/AQ are pure bets and prob even QJs,QTs.

okay. lets go to the player profile and my notes: Tight reg who is not thin vbetting enough and so far looks like a guy who is also winning in showdown a lot (so I wouldnt bet on some hero calls). That said, this card is really decent for our bluffs. Just wonder how many AcXc he has got. If not many, I would go like 1/2 with my bluffs, since I believe his Qx are folding pretty inelastically.

With value hands, I would either go as small like 1/4 to get called by Qx and raised by AQ, or just overbet shove to target 9 combos of AQ and possibly Q9s?

Not sure if I like to check/raise.. but compared with just shoving here (when only targeting Q9s,AQ) its probably better. Maybe if he would start bet/folding the river with Q9s and AQ, but would call to our overbet shove since it might looks more bluffy than the check/raise move. Plus we might get some additional value from AcXc if he bets these combos, but given our notes regarding his interest in thin vbetting, I wouldnt be relying on that.. I think its correct xb AcXc in his shoes...