Hi,I watched Lefort's videos about PF ranges and I'm trying to make BB cold call ranges vs different sizings and different raise first in percentages(using CREV).I was guesstimating R,but when I compare the ranges I got to what I see Elite pros doing in live sessions it seems my ranges are overly tight,probably because I'm being too conservative with the R's I'm estimating.These are some of the R I guesstimated.(Let's consider a 3x open with a 26% RFI for this)

But then I found these equilab R estimations,they seem much more optimistic than my estimations and in many spots there are big differences in R percentages.

Questions:

1)I always thought a hand like 32o should have R<=40% because It's just a horrible hand.But then after I saw equilab's R estimations I started with the idea that a hand like 32o doesn't have much equity to begin with,so It's not impossible that it has R=70% as equilab chart points out.In the same coin,most hands shouldn't have that big gap in R percentages between them.Question:What do you think about the statement I just made?

2)Equilab's estimations seems to differ a lot from what Lefort guesstimates in his videos.What do you think about equilab R chart to be as a guide to estimate R?Is it too optimistic?