postflop theory 2.

Posted by

Posted by posted in Low Stakes

postflop theory 2.

Hello Guys!

I think I built important rocks into my postflop game:
http://www.runitonce.com/nlhe/postflop-theory/

THX to these nice guys!

So I looked at main postflop stats of my most played villains and myself:

My thought/impressions:
- regs can be very different
- so GTO stuffs are not the best for a small stakes reg (MDF, 1-A, etc.)
- but my low cbet can be a huge leak, because most of the guys FTCB is around 50%
- let’s say average cbet size is 65%, so over 39% FTCB we can Cbet any2 card as a bluff
Q: is there any part of our range that we can play by more profit if we not make a cbet?
- cbet success is not really depends on cbet frequency
Q: is there any sense to play a balanced style? (at these stakes…)
Cbet polarized, top and bottom of our range
-Nuts
-TPGK
-Weak air/draws
Checking back middle of our range:
-TPMK, TPWK
-2nd / 3rd pairs
-Strong air/draws
- after the population read we can say regs overfolds OTR also
Q: can you imagine that we triple barrel all of our AIR as a default play, without history? /it can be very profitable by the numbers)

OMG I wrote a lot off bullshit. How could I move on?!?!?! :-)

THX, regards: T79

Loading 6 Comments...

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy