NL100 99 vs. pro short stacker
Posted by bdon22
Posted by
bdon22
posted in
Low Stakes
NL100 99 vs. pro short stacker
BN: $53.26
SB: $106.21 (Hero)
BB: $115.53
UTG: $104.50
HJ: $58.03
CO: $144.93
SB: $106.21 (Hero)
BB: $115.53
UTG: $104.50
HJ: $58.03
CO: $144.93
Short stacker is 24/21 with a 4-bet of 9.1% over 274 hands.
Preflop
($1.50)
(6 Players)
Hero was dealt
9
9
UTG folds, HJ raises to $3, CO folds, BN calls $3, Hero raises to $13, BB folds, HJ raises to $58.03, and is all in, BN folds
UTG folds, HJ raises to $3, CO folds, BN calls $3, Hero raises to $13, BB folds, HJ raises to $58.03, and is all in, BN folds
I'm not sure if I should flat this or squeeze. If it were a weaker PP I'd have no problems with set mining this and cold calling. However 99 is pretty "up there" in terms of raw equity but really bad when playing OOP mw.
Is this a squeeze, cold call, or fold?
I plugged in a 4-bet range of 9.1% into Equilab (88+,ATs+,KTs+,QJs,AJo+,KQo) and vs. that range with 99 I have 46% equity. Pot odds are 1.67:1 (38%) so I think I have to sigh/call this right?
Is this a squeeze, cold call, or fold?
I plugged in a 4-bet range of 9.1% into Equilab (88+,ATs+,KTs+,QJs,AJo+,KQo) and vs. that range with 99 I have 46% equity. Pot odds are 1.67:1 (38%) so I think I have to sigh/call this right?
*** MOD: Moved to Low Stakes [2014-02-26 20:15 CET] ***
Loading 3 Comments...
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.
This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.