Hello i would like to talk about flop cbet at micro as the preflop raiser
Using solver i have seen that on very dry board pio use the 33 % bet sizing flop 48 % of the time btn vs bb on A 7 2 rainbow
However if i node lock the BB raise to cbet to only nutted hand (which is how most people play at microstake on spain/french poker site) or when i put no raising range at all for the BB
Solver tell me to cbet the whole range at 100 % frequency against a value only raising range and 86 % against an non existant raising range which is quite an huge difference

So is it a confirmation that its not only more easy, but also more profitable to cbet range on such board at nl2-10 ? I have never heard of anyone talking of such change in cbetting frequency
Does peoples often check raise your cbet in your rooms in the micros games ? I did feel like players were raisin against cbet more on some us sites but it was higher stakes than micros

Even if this is partly exploitable if someone would have a perfect raising range as the BB i think like its very very rare in the micro and its even less probably playing zoom

Also it have the same effect for early position, and its even stronger
HJ vs BB ip player must cbet 46% of the time with a 33% sizing against a gto raising range on a72 rainbow
however if the BB have no raising range it goes up to 100% betting frequency

But assuming the BB raise only double pair and three of a kind we can cbet 100 % frequency with an 50 % sizing (Note : Even if solver use this 50 % with 100 % frequency the solver give more ev for the 33% pot one) and since BB will be capped when he call the flop and we could overfold when he raise the flop we will have an HUGE ev win along with an very easy to executee flop strategy

The exact frequency should change depending on what range you use for both player of course but it should stay similar as i have used very reasonable range not too tight not too loose
Iam curious if anyone can confirm me the usage of this exploitative strategy tho since it would change some sizing/frequency in turn and river play
Do you think it would be better to consider thoses micro player only raise double pair+ as max exploit or to play a little bit more conservating giving them no raising range ? ( which would make us play tighter on turn and river since solver will consider them to have a lot more double pair and three of a kind and making us lose less ev against potential good flop raisin strategy)

(Interesting note solved with rake, the 25 and 33 bet sizing hj vs bb have similar ev vs no check raise however against only value raise the 25 sizing have a bit more ev)
(Playing against no raising range and value only raising is almost the same on the turn)