I have a good idea of how to adjust my BB ranges based on the BTN's raise size, but i was wondering what i should take in consideration when creating a range when in the SB, facing a minraise, 2.5x 3x 3.5x... your potodds obviously get better when facing a minraise, allowing you to play a wider range, calling gets more attractive, the bigger villain goes, the more money there is to be won preflop by 3betting... but that seems like a very untheory based theory lol

This is what snowy tells me;

Facing MR
https://gyazo.com/38fb018199181682de7122aede35da02

Facing 2.5x
https://gyazo.com/9a9639315a1b2192c4b5d70bdaac31b0

Facing 3x
https://gyazo.com/ac59f6381a12bac70a84cf3973283c57

Facing 3.5x
https://gyazo.com/a6e4b2d71598818d4bd82cbb1b0d6f2c

So my ingame assumptions seem to be right, but its more about me wanting to know the theory/logic/math call it whatever you want, behind it... and for example in the facing a minraise range, we seem to be calling a decent amount, but if villain is folding a bit to much to 3bets and the bb is a though player who will not allow us to realise equilty easely postflop, we should devide from the GTO and keep on 3betting i would asume?, Or is the GTO reasoning behind splitting the range vs a minraise that i we 3bet all the hands we could/want to play our 3bet % is going to be to high?