87s on CO 50NL Zoom 6Max
Posted by CombatCarl
Posted by
CombatCarl
posted in
Low Stakes
87s on CO 50NL Zoom 6Max
BN: $53.66
SB: $100.80
BB: $70.58
UTG: $51.75
HJ: $103.42
CO: $50.25 (Hero)
SB: $100.80
BB: $70.58
UTG: $51.75
HJ: $103.42
CO: $50.25 (Hero)
I think he thinks that I'm a tag or a lag or a fag(no reference to gay people).
He is 15/9/af3.0/3bet6 389 hands
PFR EP 11
My 3bet on CO vs UTG is tight ish so I think my range is protected somewhat otherwise I would not try this play pre.
He is 15/9/af3.0/3bet6 389 hands
PFR EP 11
My 3bet on CO vs UTG is tight ish so I think my range is protected somewhat otherwise I would not try this play pre.
Preflop
($0.75)
(6 Players)
Hero was dealt
8
7
UTG raises to $1.50, HJ folds, Hero raises to $4.50, BN folds, SB folds, BB folds, UTG calls $3
UTG raises to $1.50, HJ folds, Hero raises to $4.50, BN folds, SB folds, BB folds, UTG calls $3
Flop
($9.75)
Q
3
T
(2 Players)
UTG checks,
Hero bets $5,
UTG calls $5
Once he calls my flop cbet, I think his range is pretty strong like +TT/AQs/AhJx/AhKx/AhKh
I never see him folding on turn and getting CRAI is a clear and present danger whereby we have to fold.
However, by checking/back, I think I can keep my range wide and may be discount FD from his POV and therefore if I hit one then I still get his stack on river.
Thoughts?
I never see him folding on turn and getting CRAI is a clear and present danger whereby we have to fold.
However, by checking/back, I think I can keep my range wide and may be discount FD from his POV and therefore if I hit one then I still get his stack on river.
Thoughts?
Turn
($19.75)
Q
3
T
5
(2 Players)
UTG checks,
Hero checks
River
($19.75)
Q
3
T
5
6
(2 Players)
UTG bets $12,
Hero raises to $40.75, and is all in,
UTG calls $28.75
What do you think about 3betting a tight player on UTG with SC?
I feel like I earned a check from him on turn by doing it pre.
On the other hand, may be he's playing optimally flatting AA/KK here by letting me barrel, I know I didn't on turn but, and then calling off a shove on river. We lose to AhKh but that's negligent no?
Loading 11 Comments...
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.
This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.