Hey everyone,

when the hand occured only thing I knew about villain was that he is a reg.

In retroperspective I like 4betting better just because we don't know what range villain is 3betting and what he is going to do postflop.

He should be c-betting 100%. I mean he might check weak Ax up to maybe AT because he probably won't get 3 streets value and is rather isolating himself against the stronger part of my range. But on the other hand those are the only hands he can check with, so he probably just cbets 100% to protect his bluffs and stuff.

When he checks I think he is either giving up or has a hand that has showdown value but won't get 3 streets value like AJ and worse Ax.

I don't think I can profitably bluffcatch in that spot because I don't represent a range that is folding often enough and I am pretty sure villain is aware of that. I mostly have AT-AK, maybe TT and JJ and rarely QQ+. It is hard to put him on a range because we don't know how wide his preflop range is. Nevertheless I see him valuebetting against the biggest part of my range right here.