Senter Sunday MTT Spectacular (part 2)

Posted by

You’re watching:

Senter Sunday MTT Spectacular (part 2)

user avatar

Paul Senter

Essential Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

Senter Sunday MTT Spectacular (part 2)

user avatar

Paul Senter

POSTED Apr 28, 2013

Paul continues his series and laments some of the missed opportunities the footage has revealed, with lack of attention to detail due to multi-tabling being the likely culprit.

Part 1

Part 3

11 Comments

Loading 11 Comments...

McBreed1 11 years, 10 months ago
Are all your videos going to be for elite membership only? Maybe next time you could make the first part of your serie for elite too, that way i don't have to bother watchingonly one part. Love your videos tough :)
xxmmarioxx 11 years, 10 months ago
why the hell are your vids ELITE now?? i mean, i bought a membership for all essentail pros, and suddenly one, who makes one of the most interesting videos is ugraded to ELITE. Why? Beacuse,....well, he deserved it?? What!? whats the reason behind it?? It´s absolutely not ok! an absolut dislike!!
McBreed1 11 years, 10 months ago


Thanks :), @ 10:40 you limp the sb with KQo and 26 bb. You say you don't want to raise call it off. But if you make it like 2,2 wouldn't he make it around 5bb instead of shoving most of the time? And then you can still decide to shove over his 3-bet with enough FE? And from what point (how many bb) would you start open shoving KQo in this spot intead of raise calling?

 

Paul Senter 11 years, 10 months ago
Hi guys.  Apologies for late reply, have been away for a few days, but glad the problems now fixed.

Hi mcbreed, I think KQo in the sb with 26x can certainly be played with higher variance than what I did here.  So in general vs a competent bb in the mid stages I would raise/call between 13-25x or raise/4b jam.  So with 12x or less I think its close but maybe would jam slightly more than I would induce, but would be villain dependent.  There are times like this 1 however, where I prefer the lower variance line (imo) of limp jamming.

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy